Amy Coney Barrett’s Political Views: An American Supreme Court Nominee

Amy Coney Barrett’s political views are ambiguous. Still, she is a Trump-appointed judge who will be hearing a case of intense interest to women’s rights activists and parents: Roe v. Wade.

The nomination of Amy Coney Barrett confirms that the Supreme Court will have more conservative decisions.

The opponents of her nomination are concerned with how she would affect abortion rights and LGBTQ+ rights in America.

This article details some of her opinions on these topics and other vital stances.

Amy Coney Barrett’s Political Views

Amy Coney Barrett is the newest Supreme Court nominee, and she has a lot of people talking. Did you know that she’s an activist?

This woman who will likely have one of the most powerful jobs in America has been fighting for what SHE believes in her whole life.

Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett was approved on Oct. 22 by Senate Judiciary Committee, appearing before the committee.

On Monday, the first confirmation hearing day, Amy Coney Barret pledged to accomplish her Obligations “faithfully and impartially.”

The Supreme Court Appointment Process

The process begins when a president nominates their candidate to the court. The candidate is typically interviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee and confirmed at hearings with the Senate.

If the Senate approves the nomination, which they almost always do, they will be sworn in as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court.

However, with the death of Justice Antonin Scalia on Feb. 13, 2016, the Republican-controlled Senate announced that they would not consider any candidate nominated by President Obama.

This was an unprecedented move; the Republicans used their majority to refuse to fulfill their constitutional duties. Instead of taking action, Obama let this happen.

The Senate extended his nomination period for months which effectively delayed any potential confirmation hearings during a crucial time in our nation’s presidential election.

It ultimately blocked whomever he would have chosen from being seated at all because of the looming inauguration of Donald Trump as president in January 2017.

Why did this happen? In short, it is because people often vote based on political party affiliation (a bad habit), so if a political party can get enough power, they can increase their numbers on the Supreme Court.

In this case, the Republican Party was essentially trying to “pack” a new Justice into a seat that had been empty for months to override the democratic process and maintain their majority on the court.

The Amy Coney Barret Nomination

“Courts have a vital responsibility to enforce the rule of law, which is critical to a free society. But courts are not designed to solve every problem or right every wrong in our public life.

The government’s policy decisions and value judgments must be made by the political branches elected and accountable to them.

The public should not expect courts to do so, and courts should not try”, said Amy Barrett in her opening statement.

  • The first hearing day mainly comprised opening statements from 22 senate committee members, and no questions were asked from Barret.
  • In addition to opening statements, there was an exchange of allegations between Democrats and Republicans about the Barret Ideological views and ideas. Amy also talked about Justice Antonin Scalia, saying: 

Justice Scalia taught me more than just law. He was devoted to his family, resolute in his beliefs, and fearless of criticism. And as I embarked on my own legal career, I resolved to maintain that same perspective.

Amy Coney Barrett

Amy Coney Barrett: Confirmation Hearings

On the second hearing day, Tuesday was the first questioning day that lasted about 12 hours, and every Senator was given 30 minutes to ask their questions. On Tuesday, Barret was asked about the upcoming elections and Affordable Care Act”.

She answered that she was “not here on a mission to destroy the Affordable Care Act” and would not “allow me to be used as a pawn to decide this election for the American people.”

Amy was also questioned about Trump’s statement, in which Trump said he needs his nominee confirmed.

Trump said that Democrats would rob the elections, and the matter would be solved in court. The question was asked by Senator Patrick Leahy, while Amy Barret did not answer.

Senator Dianne Feinstein of California also questions Barrett’s view regarding establishing abortion rights.

The Senator said Judge Barrett already noted that Justice Scalia is her mentor, while Justice Scalia opposed abortion rights. Moreover, Barret also declined to clear her opinion on this issue.

Related: Examples Of Laws That Are Unjust

Final Word On Amy Coney Barrett

On Wednesday, Judge Amy Barrett returned to Senate Judiciary Committees, and the questioning session continued for 9 hours. Every Senator was given 20 minutes to ask their questions.

On 3rd hearing day, Senators again asked questions on mail-in-ballot, climate change, abortion rights, and Affordable Care Act,” but Barrett dodged the answer.

She said she had admitted Obama’s Affordable Act in the past, but she never supported the law publicly. 

Barrett again declined the questions on climate change and said: “I don’t think I’m competent to opine on what causes global warming or not.”

Amy Coney Barrett now sits on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. She was appointed by Donald Trump and has been subject to extensive scrutiny from Republicans and Democrats alike.

Her nomination process raises concerns among many about her previous statements and writings and her faith.


Viable Outreach

© Viable Media, LLC