In 10 Minutes, I’ll Give You The Truth About Shareholder Activism

In 10 Minutes, I’ll Give You The Truth About Shareholder Activism

In 10 Minutes, I’ll Give You The Truth About Shareholder Activism
Home » Activism » In 10 Minutes, I’ll Give You The Truth About Shareholder Activism

This introduction analyzes the critical issues related to activist action on shareholders’ lives. Our perspective is broad about shareholder activism. For some, these words invoke images of funds that wage a proxy battle to control their target boards. This is an essential part of activism. However, in the context of my posts, the term is a means by which business owners may leverage their rights in transforming their practices or strategic decisions.

Shareholder engagement has a shallow risk of eroding. This type of activism allows investors to meet individually with company leaders to discuss their problems and suggestions. Shareholders might also actively contact management to establish symbiotic relationships and positively re-engage the business.

Pretext

The shareholder movement had weakened when COVID-19 spread across all industries. In 2020 activists targeted 25% smaller businesses in the US than in 2015. Activity began resuming in the first quarter of the second quarter of 2019. As of January 2021, the number of campaign launches increased 48% from last year. In the last few months, 67 campaigns have gotten launched, a fraction of the total activity in 2018.

In the past, mergers and acquisitions have been one of their key goals for shareholders. This could include the pressure to sell all or some of the company’s assets or to seek higher rates to acquire them.

Other emerging trends

Special-purpose acquisitions are becoming an increasingly popular alternative to IPOs. By March 2021, SPAC transactions had already exceeded the 2020s. Shareholders and activist groups can take advantage of it. The company uses SPAC funds to invest in M&A activities. Several prominent fund-management activists have recently formed SPACs. It was in early 2021 that the activist investor became a potential ally for the activist community. Retail traders used social networks and apps to manage purchases of some consumer brands’ stocks.

ESG in focus

Environmental and social sustainability (ESG) issues remain a significant concern in institutional investing when negotiating deals with companies in the shares they own. Climate change has been a critical topic in the past decade. In 2020, the emergence of massive demonstrations in response prompted many major investors to focus more on the benefits of diversity than before. ESEG expanded beyond its original role in institutional investment.

Hedge fund advocates have been pushing firms to improve their disclosure policies.

Definition and examples

Shareholder activists are individuals who use their stakes in companies to change their behavior. In some cases, shareholders can act relatively passively, including writing letters to companies. Shareholder activists can help change the company’s strategy, management, and structure. Shareholder activism has various uses. Shareholders will attempt to detain current leadership or enact changes to financial policies within the firm.

Appeal for funds types onboarding vector template. responsive mobile website with icons.

How activists pursue their goals

Several shareholder groups have turned to activism because their shares are worth increasing. Other organizations do this for reasons that some feel are affecting the longer-term value of the business. Some people also complain about company products or business operations. Activism is a diverse phenomenon.

The project aims to inspire board members to change how the company operates. What strategies are used by the shareholder will be dependent upon their objectives. What works for a long-standing investor could be unwise for a hedge fund seeking a faster return.

Shareholder proposals

Typically, shareholders view shareholder proposals as ways that begin discussions with companies. Some institutional and retailers submit shareholder proposals to companies that don’t change how they conduct business. Top shareholders to make shareholder proposals at this point. This proposal often focuses on governance, policy, executive compensation, or corporate citizenship practices.

Vote no campaigns

The campaign “vote no” urges shareholder votes in the upcoming elections. Voting No campaigns could signal a shift in shareholders’ priority. No one has to lose a campaign to win votes. Shareholder satisfaction with directors’ pay is generally higher than 90 %) The drop in support levels also signals underlying shareholder dissatisfaction.

Proxy fights

The best approach to accomplishing shareholder objectives could be replacing the entire board of directors. Those investors may choose a director and try to convince them to vote. Occasionally a contest is expensive. They have been most formally linked to hedge fund activism since the 1980s. The precise activism playbook can vary between investors, but the most common steps a hedge fund can take are:

Heading off an activist

The activism of shareholders may seem so surprising. A firm that has invested in an asset can leave managers scrambling to make a move to halt the investment. Maybe they are asked why the situation is not going so smoothly. Even receiving shareholder proposals is a bit of an unwelcome intrusion. Directors may contribute to the preparation. The activists could anticipate what actions would occur in the business and discuss the concerns they would raise and how other shareholders would react. This can be pushed to address issues at stake for activists to participate.

Take a candid look at your company

Directors should keep a keen eye on company strategies to execute them effectively. In such cases, it must be considered an objective evaluation of company performance. However, some data directors may find it difficult to see the bigger picture, and sometimes it may become so large that details get ignored. Identifying triggers for activism might help to reduce the noise within board meetings.

Activists: Who they are

A billion-dollar US securities portfolio manager said it was a “good choice” and would oppose any company with poor ESG policies. A hedge fund containing a fraction this large threatens proxy fights at an organization whose finances are overloaded with money. Both fall within the umbrella of shareholder activism. Although they have common goals, their methods are different.

Other investors

Historically, hedge funds and institutional investors dominate activism. And because they own the most money — and vote the most— they can influence change. Among them are a handful of investors. Religious organizations, non-profits, and other organizations often use shareholder activism, including shareholder-friendly proposals, to motivate companies to change. Several individuals also make their presence known through retail investments, representing most shareholders’ proposals that come to the vote during proxy seasons.

Institutional investors

A financial institution is a company that advises its investors on its investment policies. In addition, institutional investors hold more shares in the stock market than retail investors but also vote much higher in the stock markets. These are key stakeholders of a wide variety of private companies. Institutional investors are usually long-term investors. Many of these stocks are tied to broad stock indexes like the S&P 500. Some companies offer indices for investors interested because of their lower fees.

Hedge funds

Hedge fund investors seek over-average returns and constantly chase the unknown. Often hedge funds see undiscovered potential in companies or their business strategies. They see poor performance, stalled boards, or companies that miss opportunities. It sees potential for improved capital allocation strategy and operational change to increase shareholder value. When they fail to communicate their vision with executives, they often ask their board representatives to help them reach their goals.

Shareholder activism in 2022

In 2020, activists scoured dozens of firms with smaller budgets as a pandemic shook the global economy in a flurry of panic attacks and prompted deep recessions. There are plenty of signs of an upcoming resurgence.

Risk factors

All shareholder activists have a plan. History shows companies who attract activists often share common problems. Poor performance in stocks, low profits compared to peers, governance mistakes, and lack of attention to environmental sustainability may cause investor activism.

Ignoring shareholder concerns

Often skepticism is seen as an unwelcome distraction from investors. Occasionally an issue arising in shareholder engagements can turn into shareholder proposals. Sometimes a company may fail to act on an underlying issue to address it. When companies’ say-on-pay votes gain little support, they may be forced to alter their incentive program to reflect their new incentives. If such modifications do not happen, shareholders can initiate scathing campaigns against board members in compensation committees. I find the worst of it: Sometimes, hearing shareholders’ opinions makes it hard, and sometimes it is worth it.

ESG shortcomings

Perceptions of poor practices in ESG are also an attractive target for activists. It is sometimes associated with environmental problems, including a lack of transparency about the risks of climate change. This can occur in terms of social responsibility, including unsatisfactory work-related health-care practices. Political spending increases shareholder participation, as well as lobbying efforts. Several large asset managers have called for transparency on the topic. It is also essential for companies to discuss ways to reduce emissions, reduce waste in their business operations, and reduce costs.

Poor financial or share performance

Investors are seldom happy to see a company performing poorly compared to its peers or sticking to a division that doesn’t suit its core business. The investment strategy determines it, and the probability increases likewise when governance concerns come into play. Hedge funds often seek to unlock something they think will never be realized. Companies with low value-based ratios to book value have high cash-flow risk.

Governance weaknesses

Governance problems could both indicate weaknesses of any company as well as be harmful to the value of the company. Even without the structural problem, shareholders may engage companies around the board’s tenure or its employees’ refreshment.

Conclusion

That’s all for this primer on shareholder activism. For more detailed information, check out our other activist articles. And if you have any thoughts or questions about the pros and cons of shareholder activism, feel free to leave them in the comments below. We love a good debate!


Media Activists For The 99%

We are activists with a passion for social good. We want to see the world become a better place, and we’re doing everything in our power to make that happen. We know that change is possible.


Viable Outreach